Business · Photo & document cross-check

Spot the mismatch.See the evidence.

Compare photos, contracts, invoices and bank statements in one case. Check names, company details, agreed terms and payments, with a source for every finding.

Start a cross-check See an example

Findings linked to sources
Your company branding
Pay per completed check

Warranty reviewIllustrative example · invented data

Illustrative photo of a cordless drill with a model and serial-number label — Submitted photolabel.jpg

Customer’s statement

Model: MX-240
Serial number: SN-4816

label.jpgSN-4818

Needs a closer lookThe model matches. The serial number doesn’t.

Difference

Photo ↔ descriptionPhoto ↔ documentsDocuments ↔ documents

Cross-check contracts, invoices and payments.

Compare names, company details, agreed terms and payments. Every finding links to the source file.

A sample identity card being compared with a contract at a meeting table — Illustrative documents · fictional data

Full name

CONTRACT: Marina Silva1990-04-16
IDENTITY RECORD: Marina Sousa1990-04-16

Different surname

Does the contract name match the identity document?

Compare the same person’s full name, birth date, document number and address where provided. A different spelling or missing name needs clarification.

What the comparison checks

contract.pdf · p. 1 ↔ identity.pdf · p. 1. The birth date agrees; the surname differs. Ask for clarification before linking these records.

Check a similar case

What the comparison checks

People and party roles
Company names and registration details
Addresses and document identifiers
Representatives and stated authority
Bank details and payee
Contract and cross-document references
Goods, services, quantities and specifications
Prices, currency, tax and totals
Dates, payment and delivery terms
Attachments, stated signatures and completeness
Amendments and changes between versions
Other stated conditions and unchecked parameters

Choose the main contract and identify amendments. The report lists compared fields, discrepancies and information that could not be checked. Matching details do not verify identity, authority or document authenticity.

Interactive example

Review a camera return.

Inspect three files, find the mismatch and see how a correction changes the result.

Camera returnR-104

Fictional example · Free to exploreCAM-500

Source files

Select a file to inspect its example values.

camera-label.jpg

Illustrative returned camera in an open tray, with its underside label being inspected

Model: CAM-500
Serial number: CAM-2847

Only a general view was supplied. There is no close-up of the reported crack.

The values in this example are fictional. The photo illustrates the case and has not been analysed here.

What belongs to this return?

The customer supplied three files. Check the item reference and the reported fault together.

Camera photo with a visible item label
Purchase receipt with the model reference
Return request describing a casing crack

Cross-checking in practice.

Explore four fictional cases: a vehicle claim, a damaged parcel, a return and an equipment handover.

Illustrative front view of rental equipment with an asset label, ready for a handover review — Equipment handoverIllustrative example · invented data

Do the handover records agree?

Bring equipment photos, the delivery record and the acceptance sheet together before your team signs off the handover.

Materials

Equipment photos
Delivery record
Acceptance sheet

Finding · DifferenceFour units on the delivery record. Three on acceptance.

View the compared fields

Asset identifier

Document or description: delivery.pdf · page 1: EQ-731
Compared evidence: equipment-label.jpg: EQ-731

Matches

The readable asset identifiers match.

Quantity

Document or description: delivery.pdf · page 1: 4 units
Compared evidence: acceptance.pdf · page 1: 3 units

Difference

The documents list different quantities. The photos alone do not establish the total delivered.

Condition

Document or description: Acceptance description: casing intact
Compared evidence: equipment.jpg: rear panel outside the frame

More evidence needed

The submitted view does not show the entire casing.

Reviewer’s next step

Clarify the recorded quantity and request a rear-panel photo before your team signs off the handover.

Start a cross-check

An example of the report structure, not a customer result or an accuracy benchmark. A match does not prove authenticity; a difference does not establish fraud.

One company workspace

Collect files, compare details and record your decision.

Keep the request, its materials, separate analysis results and your team’s decision in the same case.

Choose a review template

Choose contracts, invoice payments, returns or equipment handover. Save your own questions, required materials and field rules for repeat work.

Collect the case materials

Add photos, PDFs, CSV or XLSX tables and a description. Collect missing documents through a client upload link.

Review the evidence together

Read the cited comparisons, keep AI-detection findings separate, and request missing evidence before taking action.

Record and share the outcome

Keep reviewer notes and the next step in the case. Export a report with your company branding for colleagues or clients.

DeepfakePolicyOne company workspace

Illustrative example · invented data

Warranty review

receipt.pdflabel.jpg

ModelMatches

Serial numberDifference

Reported damageMore evidence needed

Team reviewReviewer’s next step

Confirm the serial number and request a close-up of the reported crack.

Recorded separately

Detection and cross-checking.

Use AI detection for photos and videos, and Cross-check to compare details across files. Review the findings separately.

AI & deepfake detection

Looks for signs of AI generation and manipulation in a photo or video. Its recorded signals remain visible.

Explore photo & video detection

Evidence cross-check

Compares readable information and visible details across the submitted sources. Shows matches, differences and missing evidence.

Start a cross-check

Your team decides whether to accept, clarify or escalate. Consistency alone does not prove authenticity.

Where Cross-check can help.

Compare submitted materials in claims, returns, deliveries or your own workflow.

Returns & marketplaces

Materials: Product photos, receipt and return description.

Compare model references, visible characteristics and the issue described by the customer.

What to check next

A similar appearance does not identify the same individual item.

Warranty & after-sales

Materials: Product label, warranty document and service request.

Compare readable serial numbers, models and the supporting description.

What to check next

Unreadable identifiers need a clearer photo; coverage remains your decision.

Insurance & claims

Materials: Claim photos, submitted documents and incident description.

Compare object details and visible observations with the information in the claim.

What to check next

The analysis does not establish cause, event date, liability or coverage.

Logistics & deliveries

Materials: Package photos, shipping documents and delivery description.

Compare readable shipment references, visible labels and reported packaging damage.

What to check next

Photos alone do not establish the contents or completeness of a delivery.

Rental & equipment

Materials: Equipment photos, handover record and inventory description.

Compare visible asset identifiers and condition descriptions.

What to check next

Changes in condition require comparable views and human review.

Property & field operations

Materials: Site photos, work records and a description of completed tasks.

Compare visible items and work described in the submitted record.

What to check next

Hidden work, technical compliance and workmanship require other checks.

Explore business uses

Warranty claim checklist: photos, receipts and serial numbers

DeepfakePolicy

A report your team can work from.

Each finding links to the file and details used in the comparison. Download the saved report without running or paying for the check again.

Compared values, source files and page references
File hashes and the recorded analysis time
Your company branding and review notes
JSON, text and PDF exports

Connect comparisons to your application.

Submit a comparison with a live company API key, then retrieve its findings through the existing job endpoints. The OpenAPI specification describes the request, limits and result. Sandbox fixtures do not evaluate comparisons.

Read the API specification Open the developer console

POST /v1/comparisons

Pay per completed comparison.

Company billing, with the price shown before you submit.

£0.66per comparison

Start a cross-check

Applicable taxes are additional. A completed analysis can contain uncertain findings. AI-image detection is a separate, separately priced check.

View business pricing

Evaluate Cross-check on your cases

What you can submit

Up to 6 JPEG, PNG, WebP, PDF, CSV or XLSX files per comparison: 5 MiB per file, 10 MiB in total and up to 50 PDF pages in total. Add a description to explain what you want compared.

Company reports are available for 7 days. Source files are removed after processing. Upload only materials you are authorised to use.

Data processing and retention

Before your first comparison

Does a match prove the documents or photos are genuine?

No. Consistent information can appear in fabricated material. This service compares submitted evidence; it does not authenticate an issuer, signature, identity or event.

What happens when text or a detail is unclear?

Missing or uncertain evidence is flagged for review. Extraction can still be wrong. Check the source and provide a clearer image before relying on an extracted identifier or a visual observation.

Is this only for insurance?

No. The service supports business workflows that compare photos with documents or descriptions. Its usefulness depends on the material and the question; test representative examples from your process.

Does the service accept or reject a customer’s claim?

No. Findings support your team’s review. Decisions about refunds, coverage, payment or fraud remain with your business.

Try Cross-check on your own case.

Start with a case you know and compare the findings with your team’s review.

Start a cross-check

Before your first comparison

Does a match prove the documents or photos are genuine?

No. Consistent information can appear in fabricated material. This service compares submitted evidence; it does not authenticate an issuer, signature, identity or event.

What happens when text or a detail is unclear?

Missing or uncertain evidence is flagged for review. Extraction can still be wrong. Check the source and provide a clearer image before relying on an extracted identifier or a visual observation.

Is this only for insurance?

Does the service accept or reject a customer’s claim?

No. Findings support your team’s review. Decisions about refunds, coverage, payment or fraud remain with your business.

Spot the mismatch.See the evidence.

Cross-check contracts, invoices and payments.

Does the contract name match the identity document?

Same company name. Different registration number.

Was the invoice issued at the agreed price?

Do the delivery records cover the agreed quantity?

Has the new deadline been carried into the invoice?

One invoice. Two payments. A calculated balance.